Hunting helps to reduce population levels, which may also be a factor in reducing overall accident levels. A bitter debate has erupted over the British Columbia government's recent decision to end grizzly bear trophy hunting. Trophy hunting is a recreational activity in which people can hunt specific, approved animals under a government license. This is tricky; there are many pros and cons for trophy hunting to be used as a conservation tool. Back in 1991 I was lecturing in Salt Lake City at the Holiday Inn at the airport on finding trophy mule deer out west. Trophy Hunting for Conservation Purposes? In Africa, it is characterised by high fees for ‘trophy’ species and low off-take volume, as part of a programme administered by a government, community-based organisation, NGO, or other legitimate body. International trophy hunting is a multinational, multimillion-dollar industry practiced throughout the world. Many organizations have requested for banning trophy hunting. … The major argument is that the money made from hunting goes right back in to conservation efforts by allowing the large amounts of land to …

Especially, canned hunting is perceived as the most damaging because the animals are raised for hunting and do not possess the real tactics for running or escaping hunters. They hunted what they needed so they could put food on their tables. Environment lovers hate trophy hunting due to the killing of the wild animals for sport. The Onion breaks down the pros and cons of big-game hunting: PRO. 1. In Namibia, a flagship country for so-called ‘community-based natural resource management’ (CBNRM), trophy hunting plays a crucial role in this programme; in CBNRM, local groups are targeted to contribute to conservation and to live together with the wildlife. The game sought is typically a large or impressively ornamented male, such as one having large horns or antlers. Global and local effects of trophy hunting - Trophy hunting does allow for large numbers of tourists to bring income … It is more of a sport than a necessity of life. Following the death of Cecil the lion in Zimbabwe, many governments are beginning to question the ethics and fallout of trophy hunting as a sport, while others say the arguments against it are overblown. When a hunt is successful, the body parts of the animal are taken and treated as “trophies” or symbols of a successful kill.

American trophy hunters pay big money to kill animals overseas and import over 126,000 wildlife trophies per year on average.

This is a disadvantage for the wildlife as they lack the skills which other … The answer is an unequivocal yes. They also do their sport-killing domestically: Bears, bobcats, mountain lions, wolves and other domestic wildlife also fall victim to trophy hunting, damaging natural ecosystems. A guy came up after the lecture and stated he was going to start a magazine like mine. Trophy hunting is broadly defined as the killing of animals for recreation with the purpose of collecting trophies such as horns, antlers, skulls, skins, tusks, or teeth for display. The Pro Hunting Argument Most trophy hunters will argue that hunting the likes of elephants, lions, and rhinos helps the wheel of conservation. Hunting was rarely about finding a trophy to hang on a wall for our ancestors. In his last issue Rusty Hall states that his magazine (Trophy Hunter) is the original trophy hunting magazine. Proponents of trophy hunting argue that it is good for conservation and for the development of marginalised people. Trophy hunting or sport hunting is hunting of wild game for human recreation.